Thursday, May 23, 2019

CHA & Nan McKay are training to hire!

Want to learn while you earn? 
Can you work full time (40 hours/week)? 
Do you pride yourself on providing excellent customer service? 

We are currently looking for qualified candidates to take part in a training program for Clerk, Scanning Clerk, Call Center Representative and Housing Specialist positions. See below for more details or click here for a PDF of the flyer.

If interested, contact Jackie at 312-442-1127 or jackie.murillo@eesforjobs.com to get started!
 
 
 

Wednesday, May 22, 2019

Community Meetings, City Jobs and More!!


Internet Essentials from Comcast brings affordable high-speed internet to your home!



The Chicago Housing Authority knows that our community members depend on the internet in their home. In today’s world, now more than ever, we all need access – whether it is for a job search, homework assignments, or sending/receiving email.
 
That’s why they have partnered with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and Comcast. Internet EssentialsSM from Comcast brings affordable high-speed internet to your home and greater access to what’s important to you.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Features of Internet Essentials include:
 
o  High-speed internet service for $9.95 + tax per month
·        No term contract or credit check
·        No installation fee
·        In-home WiFi included
o  Access to 40 1-Hour sessions of Xfinity WiFi hotspots outside the home every 30 days
o  The option to purchase a refurbished desktop or laptop for $149.99 + tax
o  Free in-person and online digital training classes 
 
Comcast has expanded eligibility* for Internet Essentials to include all households receiving HUD housing assistance and low-income veterans who receive state and/or federal assistance. This is great news for our community, including seniors, and those without children. We encourage you to learn about and apply for this opportunity by visiting www.InternetEssentials.com or by calling (855) 339-0738.
  
* To qualify for Internet Essentials, you must receive HUD housing assistance, including Public Housing, Housing Choice Vouchers (Section 8 Vouchers) or Multifamily (including Project-Based Section 8). You must not have outstanding debt to Comcast that is less than one year old. You must live in an area where Comcast Internet service is available but not have subscribed to it within the last 90 days.  
Internet Essentials from Comcast is a program to provide home Internet service for those who receive HUD housing assistance. It is not a Community or Housing Authority program, and is not required by your Community or Housing Authority. Your Community or Housing Authority is not responsible for Internet Essentials accounts. No Community or Housing Authority funds were used for this notice.

Monday, May 20, 2019

Tony Robbins: Your Only Competition Is Yourself (A MUST SEE!!)


Bill Introduced to Remove SNAP Time Limits


A bill recently introduced in the House would lift the harmful time limits on Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits to ensure all low-income adults have access to food. Under current law, childless adults aged 18-49 without a documented disability are subject to a harsh three-month time limit of SNAP benefits in a three-year period, unless they meet a strict work reporting requirement. The Improving Access to Nutrition Act (H.R. 2809), introduced on May 16 by Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA) with 23 co-sponsors, would lift the time limit from SNAP benefits to ensure that these unemployed and underemployed adults have access to nutrition assistance. The Coalition on Human Needs endorsed the legislation, as did several of CHN’s members, including Bread for the World, the Center for Law and Social Policy (CLASP), the Food Research & Action Center, Feeding America, and others. In a letter of support for the bill, CHN noted that “some workers lose vital assistance because they work hours provided by their employers are volatile; others find it difficult to document the work they have done.”

Earlier this year, the Trump Administration proposed making it harder for states with elevated unemployment rates to qualify for waivers of the time limit. By the Administration’s own calculations, the proposed rule would take food away from 755,000 low-income Americans. Late last year, Congress enacted and President Trump signed a new farm bill that rejected stricter time limits.

Proposed HUD Rule Could Harm More than 100,000



More than 100,000 people could be affected if a proposed rule dictating who may and may not live in public housing is enacted. The proposed Housing and Urban Development (HUD) regulation would prohibit “mixed status families” from living in public and other subsidized housing. Mixed status families are households that include members who are eligible and others who are ineligible for housing assistance based on their immigrant status.
Currently, HUD allows families to live together in subsidized housing even if one family member is ineligible so long as the housing subsidy is prorated to exclude the ineligible person from the assistance.

The rule has been submitted for public comment; comments will be accepted until July 9.
An impact analysis prepared by career staff at HUD shows how devastating the proposal would be. It found that 108,000 people would be affected. About 70 percent of those people are citizens or legal residents and three-quarters of those – 55,000 – are children.

According to the analysis, HUD assumes that some of the affected families would split up because the ineligible family member would be asked to leave so that the rest of the family could still receive aid. But it says most of the families would likely move out of their proposed homes. “HUD expects that fear of the family being separated would lead to prompt evacuation by most mixed households, whether that fear is justified,” the agency says. Diane Yentel, President and CEO of the National Low Income Housing Coalition, said in an interview with NPR’s Pam Fessler that the proposal is cruel. “The cruelty of it is really breathtaking and it would do real harm to kids and to families.”

HUD Secretary Ben Carson said the rule is needed to help low-income Americans who are in need of housing assistance and may face lengthy waits. “Our nation faces affordable housing challenges and hundreds of thousands of citizens are waiting for many years on waitlists to get housing assistance,” he said.

But Carson’s own words are undermined by the HUD analysis, which predicts that the rule would lead to a decrease in those receiving housing assistance as well as a decrease in the amount of funding available to those in need. This is in part because mixed status families tend to receive smaller subsidies than other families, and in part because other families’ incomes tend to be lower and thus qualify for higher subsidies, which would put added stress on available benefits.

“Another, and perhaps the likeliest scenario, would be that HUD would have to reduce the quantity and quality of assisted housing in response to higher costs,” the agency says. For public housing, that would likely “have an impact on the quality of service, e.g., maintenance of the units and possibly deterioration of the units that could lead to vacancy.”

Housing advocates are viewing the proposal with alarm.

“The administration has made clear its intention to make life more difficult for immigrant families by restricting their ability to access basic needs programs,” said Olivia Golden, Executive Director of the Center for Law and Social Policy (CLASP). “The proposed rule by HUD continues this pattern of attacks – this time by threatening the roof over their heads and directly undermining the wellbeing of citizen children.”

Melissa Boteach, Vice President for Income Security and Child Care/Early Learning at the National Women’s Law Center, called the proposal “a blatant attempt by the Trump Administration to pit struggling families against one another in the wake of a $1.9 billion tax cut for millionaires and corporations.”

“Forcing thousands of immigrant families to make the unconscionable decision to either break up to receive housing assistance or forgo housing assistance altogether will not fix the nation’s housing crisis – raising wages and making significant new investments in affordable housing will.”

Late last week, Rep. Sylvia Garcia (D-TX) introduced H.R. 2716, which would prevent HUD from implementing the rule. She was joined by Reps. Lou Correa (D-CA), Veronica Escobar (D-TX), Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), and Chuy Garcia (D-IL). The measure immediately was backed by the National Low Income Housing Coalition, the National Housing Law Project, and Texas Housers.

Here's Your Chance To Learn Robotics!


Due to a high demand for information on Robotics and the BSD Robotics Training & On the Job Experience 13-month training program, BSD now offers Information Sessions & Tours the last Thursday of every month!
 
When: Last Thursday of Every Month, 2 p.m. (next one is May 30, 2019)

Where: BSD Industries L3C, 9551 S. Cottage Grove
 
RSVP today! Email info@bsdindustries.org or call 872-529-7093.






Program Overview

The program is a 13-month stackable certificate vocational program consisting of five (5), 10-week training modules.
  • Boost Camp (Readiness & Assessment) - Intensive instruction in language arts, math and cognition.
  • Level I - 2D/3D Computer Aided Drafting (CAD)
  • Level II - Industrial control systems (electrical, pneumatic, hydraulic)
  • Level III - Automation controls programming and troubleshooting
  • Level IV - Robotics programming and troubleshooting 
Additional Program Benefits
  • Levels I-IV - Eligible to earn industry recognized credentials at each level.
  • Levels I-IV - Eligible to earn college credit toward an Advanced Manufacturing Degree.
  • Levels III and IV - Up to 400-hours of paid apprenticeship/internship opportunities.
  • Job Placement and Supportive Service Assistance. 
Training Eligibility
  • Eligibility 18+ years old and high school diploma or GED.
Training Schedule
  • Day and Evening classes are offered. Classes meet three (3) days a week.
  • Classes located at Chicago State University 9501 South King Drive.
  • BSD Manufacturing Plant located at 9551 South Cottage Grove Avenue.

Thursday, May 16, 2019

HUD Proposed Rule on Mixed-Status Families

 
 
On May 10, 2019, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) released a proposed rule titled “Housing and Community Development Act of 1980: Verification of Eligible Status.” The rule would significantly change HUD’s regulations by further restricting eligibility for federal housing assistance based on immigration status. If finalized, the proposed rule will effectively evict 25,000 immigrant families from their homes, including over 55,000 children who are eligible for housing assistance under federal law.


WHAT WOULD THE PROPOSED RULE DO?

The proposed rule prohibits “mixed-status” families from living in federally subsidized units that are subject to immigration status restrictions under Section 214 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1980 (“Section 214”). Mixed-status families are households comprised of members who have eligible and ineligible immigration statuses as defined in Section 214. Currently, families with at least one U.S. citizen or eligible immigrant are permitted to live together in a subsidized housing unit. Mixed-status families receive housing assistance on a prorated basis—where the amount of the housing subsidy for the household is decreased to account for family members with ineligible immigration status. That is, the subsidy is based on the portion of eligible household members in the unit. Existing laws ensure that only U.S. citizens and eligible immigrants can receive these housing subsidies.
The proposed rule requires that every household member be a U.S. citizen or an eligible immigrant. However, if the head of the household’s immigration status has been verified, a temporary period of prorated assistance may be allowed while the status of other family members is being verified.

Furthermore, the rule would require that the status of all household members younger than 62 years old be verified through the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (“SAVE”) system, which is operated by the Department of Homeland Security.
 
The rule also makes changes to the citizenship and immigration verification requirements for U.S. citizens and noncitizens who are 62 years old or older, as detailed below.



The rule would apply to all households currently receiving Section 214 subsidies, as well as to anyone who may apply for these housing programs in the future.


WHICH AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAMS ARE COVERED UNDER THE

 PROPOSED RULE?

The rule would apply to the following federal housing assistance programs:
 
• Public Housing
 
Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers

Section 8 Project-Based Housing

Section 235 Home Loan Program

Section 236 Rental Assistance Program

The Rent Supplement Program

Housing Development Grant Programs (low-income units only)







WOULD THE RULE AFFECT OTHER FEDERAL HOUSING ASSISTANCE
PROGRAMS?
 
 
While only the programs listed above are covered by the proposed rule, other federal, state, and local housing programs may be implicated where layers of subsidies that include one of the listed programs are used to make units affordable to very low-income families. For example, a mixed-status family living in a Low-Income Housing Tax Credit unit with Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher assistance would be affected by this proposed rule.



WHO IS AN “ELIGIBLE” IMMIGRANT?


Only U.S. citizens and individuals with one of the following immigrant statuses are eligible for federal subsidies

under Section 214:

U.S. Citizens and Nationals

Lawful Permanent Residents (LPR)

VAWA Self-Petitioners

Asylees and Refugees

• Parolees


Persons Granted Withholding of Removal/Deportation

Victims of Trafficking

Individuals residing in the U.S. under the Compacts of Free Association with the Marshall Islands,
Micronesia, Palau and Guam
 

Immigrants admitted for lawful temporary residence under the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986


WHO IS AN “INELIGIBLE” IMMIGRANT?
 
 
Other immigration categories not listed under the above “eligible” immigrant list are ineligible for housing assistance under Section 214. For example, ineligible immigrants include those who are in the U.S. on temporary employment or student visas, persons granted Temporary Protected Status, or survivors of serious crimes granted U non-immigrant status.


AN “INELIGIBLE” IMMIGRANT IS NOT AN UNDOCUMENTED IMMIGRANT?

Being “ineligible” for housing subsidies is not
 
equivalent to being undocumented. There are many immigrants
with legal status who are ineligible for certain federally subsidized housing. A poignant example of ineligible immigrants are U-visa holders, who are crime victims that have suffered significant physical or mental abuse while in the U.S. and are assisting law enforcement and government officials in prosecuting those who perpetrated the criminal activities.


DOES THIS MEAN THAT IMMIGRANTS WHO ARE NOT ELIGIBLE FOR SECTION 214 HOUSING WOULD NOT BE AFFECTED BY THE RULE?
 
 
No. Any immigrant or U.S. citizen living as part of a mixed-status family would be harmed by this rule. A mixed-status family would be faced with the impossible choice of breaking up their families to ensure that some members still receive the assistance or forgoing the assistance to keep the family together and potentially facing homelessness.
 

 
HOW MUCH TIME WOULD MIXED-STATUS FAMILIES THAT CHOOSE TO STAY TOGETHER HAVE BEFORE THEY WOULD LOSE THEIR ASSISTANCE?
 
 
The proposed rule includes a “temporary deferral of termination of assistance” provision. Under this provision, mixed-status families can continue to receive prorated assistance if they can show that:

1. The family made reasonable efforts to find new affordable housing but were unsuccessful in their search,
or
 

2. The vacancy rate for affordable housing is less than five percent in the area that they currently reside, or

3. The local jurisdiction’s consolidated plan reports that the local housing market lacks sufficient affordable housing opportunities for families of the size and income level of the family seeking temporary deferral.

Families can receive a temporary deferral for an initial period of up to six months. The family may be able to get this time extended for two additional six-month periods, for a total of 18 months of temporarily deferred termination of assistance.


 
HOW WOULD THE RULE CHANGE CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION
VERIFICATION REQUIREMENTS?
 
Under current HUD regulations, only family members that are applying for housing assistance need to have
their immigration status verified. Family members that would not qualify for assistance based on their immigration status can elect not to contend eligibility for the housing assistance, allowing the family to receive assistance on a prorated basis. The proposed rule would eliminate an individual’s ability to elect not to contend their eligibility for the subsidy, and would require all household members under the age of 62 to submit verification of their immigration status through the Department of Homeland Security’s Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) system.
 


Under the proposed rule, U.S. Citizens and Nationals
 
, who currently must only provide a signed declaration
of U.S. citizenship or U.S. nationality, would also need to submit documentation of their citizenship status. Furthermore, noncitizens who are 62 years old and older
 
, who currently are only required to provide a
signed declaration of eligible immigration status and a proof of age document, would also be required submit immigration documentation, although the documentation would not be verified through SAVE.
If these individuals are not able to produce the documentation in the required timeframes, then they risk losing their housing assistance.



WHAT IF EVERYONE IN THE HOUSEHOLD IS AN ELIGIBLE IMMIGRANT, BUT IT IS TAKING SOME TIME TO VERIFY THEIR IMMIGRATION STATUS?
 
The proposed rule allows for temporary prorated assistance to families once their head of household or leaseholder has established an eligible immigration status. However, this prorated assistance would only be available while the remaining household members establish that they have an eligible immigration status. If it is established that there are ineligible family members in the household, the family would no longer qualify for prorated assistance. 

 
WOULD ANY MIXED-STATUS FAMILIES BE EXEMPTED FROM THIS RULE?
 
 
While no mixed-status families will be exempted under the proposed rule, certain families may qualify for continued assistance, where they will be able to continue to receive assistance on a prorated basis. To qualify for continued assistance, a mixed-status family must meet the following conditions:

1. The family must have been receiving assistance from a housing program covered by Section 214 on June

19, 1995.

2. The family’s head of household (leaseholder) must have an eligible immigration status under Section 214.

3. The ineligible family members in the household must be either: the spouse of the head of household, children of the spouse or head of household, or parents of the spouse or head of household. Other ineligible family members (such as aunts, uncles, cousins, etc.) would prevent a family from receiving continued assistance under the rule.

HOW MANY FAMILIES WILL BE HARMED OR AFFECTED BY THIS RULE?
 
 
According to HUD data, approximately 25,000 mixed-status families across the country currently receiving assistance would be forced to decide between breaking up their families or forgoing their assistance. In these families, over 55,000 children who are eligible for the assistance will be harmed by this rule because their parents are ineligible immigrants.

Millions more immigrant families will be harmed by the fear and confusion created by this rule and related policies by the Trump Administration, as families decide not to seek or to leave lifeline housing subsidy programs for which they are eligible.

 
HOW WOULD THIS RULE AFFECT HOUSING PROVIDERS ADMINISTERING
THESE ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS?
 
 
The rule would require housing providers to collect and verify documentation that was not previously required. Tens of thousands of public housing agencies and private property owners would need to collect documents “proving” the citizenship of more than nine million assisted residents who have already attested, under penalty of perjury, that they are U.S. citizens, as well as the citizenship of future applicants for assistance. They would also need to collect status documentation from about 120,000 elderly immigrants. Housing authorities must create new policies to determine which families will receive continued assistance or temporary deferment of termination.

All of these new requirements would impose new administrative costs and burdens for housing providers, which HUD does not account for in the rule. These costs could deter housing providers from participating or continuing to participate in these programs, which would exacerbate the affordable housing crisis.

 
I AM WORRIED ABOUT WHETHER THE RULE APPLIES TO ME. SHOULD I GIVE UP MY HOUSING ASSISTANCE?
 
 
This is only a proposed rule. The agency will be accepting comments on it, and must respond to the comments before it can become final or effective. The final rule is not likely to go into effect for many months, and the proposed rule would offer the possibility of a temporary deferral of termination of assistance to give families time to transition to unsubsidized housing. Affordable housing is essential for families to thrive. If you have questions about your situation or whether you should remain in your housing, you can consult a housing attorney.
 
 
WHAT CAN I DO?
 
 
You can fight back by submitting comments to HUD explaining why this rule would have a catastrophic impacton you, your family, friends, neighbors, tenants, and clients. The deadline to submit comments is July 9, 2019. Individuals can submit comments directly to HUD via NLIHC.

 
 
 
For more information, please contact Elayne Weiss, NLIHC Senior Policy Analyst,at eweiss@nlihc.org, or Karlo Ng, NHLP Supervising Attorney, at kng@nhlp.org.



Chicago Filmmakers Screenings

It's another rainy day in Chicago, film fans! This week we're featuring a screening from Chicago director Michael Glover Smith: MERCURY IN RETROGRADE, which Smith is scheduled to attend! Keep reading to learn more about this week's screening as well as other upcoming screenings, and see what the critics have to say about Smith's MERCURY IN RETROGRADE. 

THIS WEEK'S SCREENING
Mercury in Retrograde - Trailer
MERCURY IN RETROGRADE TRAILER
MERCURY IN RETROGRADE
7PM, SATURDAY, MAY 18
Dir. Michael Glover Smith is Scheduled to Attend!

"All of life, and certainly all of [MERCURY IN RETROGRADE] is about ebb and flow--in romantic relationships, friendships, and as time passes. Mercury in Retrograde is its own ebb and flow--sometimes too slow moving, sometimes bordering on cliché or slightly over the top, but also full of charm and some standout characters, with a more nuanced message just under the surface that makes it worth a viewing.   --Marielle Bokor, Third Coast Review
UPCOMING SCREENINGS
OPEN SCREENING
SATURDAY, JUNE 1, 7:30PM
This is your time to shine! Bring your work--insane comedies, touching dramas, high-energy music videos, odd animation, hot topic documentaries, neighborhood portraits, and any mind-expanding experimental visions. Maximum length per person is 20 minutes, and we will screen at least one work from everyone who brings something. Accepted formats: Blu-Ray, DVD, or digital files. Nothing X-rated-sorry! Enjoy with friends and community! Admission is FREE! 

To participate, please send us your files here before May 28th at 3:00PM. 
STONEWALL UPRISING
SATURDAY, JUNE 8, 7PM
Told by Stonewall patrons, reporters and the cop who led the raid, Stonewall Uprising recalls the bad old days when psychoanalysts equated homosexuality with mental illness and advised aversion therapy, and even lobotomies; public service announcements warned youngsters against predatory homosexuals; and police entrapment was rampant. At the height of this oppression, the cops raid Stonewall, triggering nights of pandemonium with tear gas, billy clubs and a small army of tactical police. The rest is history.
THE SOMERSAULTER-MOATS AND SOMERSAULTER SUPER PREMIERE FILM EVENT
SATURDAY, JUNE 15, 7PM

Between 1973 and 1991, JP Somersaulter and Lillian Somersaulter Moats produced over 20 animated short films for children and adults. Their subject matter frequently deals with the human mind and creative process, which is reflected in their narrative style. Lillian and JP's stories for adult audiences have been referred to as "Kafkaesque." and, even at their most lighthearted and whimsical, tend to carry a sinister undertone. Their work is influenced by their shared interests in storytelling, myth, creativity and the logic of thought. 
Chicago Filmmakers is generously funded by the following organizations: